Insulation is harder than it looks

A big component of our stove is its insulation.  Between the inner chamber (where combustion happens) and the outer walls is a lot of space.  If we simply left it empty, then hot air would move around and carry heat from the inside to the outer walls in much the same way your oven cooks food.

The obvious answer is to use insulation.  But what kind?  Often ceramics, sand, and earth come up.  It’s true that these would slow down the transfer of heat from the inner wall to the outer wall, but they do it by absorbing energy.  In scientific terms, they have a higher specific heat capacity than air which means that, for every degree they change, they absorb more energy.  This is helpful for safety, but it can actually decrease the efficiency of a stove.

In order to have an efficient stove, you need materials that don’t transfer heat very well–or, in other words, materials that are not very thermally conductive.  Air is actually pretty good with respect to this, but it’s a problem when it moves around freely.  Many of the best insulators simply work by trapping air in small pockets.  This is how down blankets work.

Our initial prototype used perlite, but it’s not readily available in Myanmar, so we’ve been exploring the possibility of importing it and other materials.  Ash is readily available and a pretty good insulator.  We’ve also been looking at special clay mixtures which are much lighter (and thus have a lower specific heat capacity) than normal ceramics.

As always, we’d love to hear from anyone with thoughts/advice on the manner!

Bookmark and Share

Tags: , , , ,

One Response to “Insulation is harder than it looks”

  1. BRT Says:

    You don’t need an insulator. You need to move the cold are through that area that is being heated, and thus, “recycle” the wasted heat. The stove should be designed with that in mind for max. efficiency.